Gina Burgio, Mortgage Agent


US News: Why Canada Avoided a Mortgage Meltdown


Suppose we agree that we would like our society to have widespread home ownership and a property-owning citizenry. Does it take government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with implied taxpayer guarantees, tax advantages for the interest paid on home mortgages, and government pressure for "creative" mortgage lending to achieve this?

The Canadian experience shows that it doesn't.

Canada makes a useful comparison for the U.S. Both countries are rich, advanced, stable, have sophisticated financial systems and pioneer histories, and stretch from Atlantic to Pacific. But Canada has no housing GSEs. Mortgage interest is not tax deductible. It does not have 30-year fixed rate, freely prepayable mortgage loans. Mortgage lending is more conservative and much more creditor-friendly.

Canadian mortgage lenders have full recourse to the mortgage borrower's other assets and income, in addition to having the house as collateral. This means there is little incentive for borrowers to "walk away" from their mortgage. The absence of a tax deduction for mortgage interest probably increases the incentive to pay down debt. Most Canadian mortgage payments are made through automatic debit of the borrower's checking account-a technical but important point. Canadian fixed-rate mortgages typically have prepayment penalties to protect the lender and the interest rate on the loan is fixed for only up to five years.

This relative creditor conservatism has meant that Canada and Canadian banks have so far come through the international financial crisis in much better shape than their U.S. counterparts. Canada didn't avoid the recession, but mortgage delinquencies have so far remained much lower than in the U.S., with the percentage of loans delinquent 90 days or more at approximately one-tenth of the U.S. level.

What about the home ownership rate-the percentage of all households owning their own home? Isn't there a home ownership price to pay for this Canadian credit conservatism? No.

Here's the home ownership rate in Canada: 68%. In the U.S. it's 67%. The U.S. rate peaked at the top of the housing bubble at 69%. In other words, two very different housing finance systems, one much riskier than the other, produced virtually the same home ownership rate.

This must cause us to call into question longstanding U.S. beliefs about the relationship of government-subsidized housing finance to home ownership.

The former savings-and-loan industry justified its special tax and regulatory privileges, including its right to pay more interest on deposits than commercial banks were then allowed to, by appealing to its role in home ownership. Then came the savings and loan collapse of the 1980s.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac took over the home ownership mantra. In the vast risk expansion of their arrogant days, with very high rates of profitability made possible by government-granted privileges, they justified these privileges by appealing to home ownership. It was often said by their supporters that the GSE-dominated U.S. housing finance system generated the highest home ownership rates in the world, which was false, and that this system was the "envy of the world," which was also false. Fannie Mae's annual reports regularly featured a house with an American flag flying.

Now it is clear to everyone that Fannie and Freddie, having done so much to help inflate the bubble and having been dragged into insolvency by its deflation, are wards of the government. The taxpayer bailout of these GSEs is likely to cost much more than the bailout of the saving and loans did a generation ago. The U.S. Treasury has unilaterally signed the taxpayers up for unlimited support of these bankrupt purveyors of government-advantaged mortgage finance.

So the widespread previous beliefs about the desirability of having GSEs were wildly mistaken. It ought to be clear by now that an entity can be a private company with market discipline, or it can be a government body with governmental discipline, but it can't be both.

In this context, it is important to recognize that Canada does have a government body to promote housing finance: the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, which is the dominant credit insurer of mortgages in the country. Whether or not you like the idea of such a government financing operation, at least its status is perfectly clear and honest. The Canadian government owns 100% of its stock. Its guaranty from the government is explicit. It provides housing subsidies which are on budget and must be appropriated.

Let's remember that the original sin of making Fannie a GSE in 1968 was to get it off the federal budget so the deficit looked smaller. Canada in this respect looks superior to the U.S. in candor as well as credit performance.

Mr. Pollock is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C. He was president and CEO of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago from 1991 to 2004

Gina Burgio

Gina Burgio, Mortgage Agent
VERICO Designer Mortgages Inc.
Toll Free: 1-877-345-6265
Fax: 1-877-345-6256


Each VERICO Broker is an independent owner operator.

Comment balloon 3 commentsGina Burgio • March 19 2010 09:14AM
US News: Why Canada Avoided a Mortgage Meltdown
By ALEX J. POLLOCK Suppose we agree that we would like our society to have widespread home ownership and a property-owning citizenry. Does it take government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with implied taxpayer… more
New Mortgage Rules Leave Homebuyers Confused: Insured buyers must…
Frank and Susan Williams bought a house near Hamilton, Ont., this month, they followed a time-honoured tradition of using leveraged financing. With mortgage insurance they only had to put down 5% of the $270, 000 purchase price… more
The History of St. Patrick's Day
Half the office has plans to go partying tonight… okay, more than half the office! In the wee hours of the morning, I caught myself wondering what is the origin of St. Patrick's Day and why is it celebrated on March 17th? It turns out that… more
National News: Loonie rises to highest level since July 2008
TORONTO -- The Canadian dollar rose to its highest level since July 2008 on Tuesday after the U. S. Federal Reserve held benchmark interest rates near zero, as expected, and renewed its promise to keep them exceptionally low for an extended… more
Great article on Gail Vaz-Oxlade
Great story today on Gail Vaz-Oxlade. I love her show and I think she is doing wonders to educate Canadians on debt and knowing their financial situation. GB Don't just fall into a debt hole Roma Luciw From Monday's… more
Canadian Mortgage Rates Expected to Rise 2-3% Over Next Two Years
I heard an interesting fact today about the financial state of first time homebuyers: According to reports, 75% of 18-34 year old first time homebuyers would be in trouble if their paycheck was delayed one week. That's huge. Mortgages are… more
Looking forward to an exciting spring market
I can forsee this spring in Canada being huge for mortgages and real estate. With an already booming real estate market and incredible mortgage rates business looks like it will be great. I can imagine a big push on sales before the HST comes… more
Bloomberg Update on Canadian Dollar Trades
Canada Dollar Trades Near Five-Month High on Growth Outlook Canada's dollar traded near its strongest level in almost five months as investors bet the nation's economy will be among the strongest during the recovery… With trade data… more
Choose mortgage words carefully
Many consumers fail to understand meaning of terms By GARRY MARR, Financial PostMarch 10, 2010 When it comes to your mortgage contract, watch your language. Most consumers only look at their mortgage… more
Canada due for "boring is beautiful" budget
This year's budget is not expected to be overly exciting and that seems to be a good thing for the current economic state. With all the major changes to the market, including changes to the Mortgage rules, being released ahead of time; or as this… more